December 02, 2003

A thought

Apparently Gov. Schwarzenegger (that still has a strange ring to it) has gotten the California legislature to repeal a law allowing undocumented immigrants to get California driver's licenses. I don't know the specifics of the law, so I can't say whether I support the decision or not, but I have a couple of thoughts relating to the question of whether of non-U.S. citizens driving in this country.

First, why not let them apply for an international driver's licence? I'm sure they're available from Mexico, and otherwise they could perhaps be obtained from AAA or the National Auto Club. This would give foreign drivers an extra level of credibility when driving in the States.

Second, my understanding is that the backers of the repealed law saw it as a way to encourage illegal immigrants to get auto insurance. I don't see why that can't be accomplished without the law, either through US insurance companies insuring non-native drivers or Mexican insurance companies covering drivers who enter the US. I'd imagine the collections process would be more difficult, but it couldn't be worse than dealing with an uninsured driver.

Just my two, not very well-informed cents. Pick away at it as you wish.

Posted by Andrew Huff at December 2, 2003 02:08 PM
Comments

The biggest problem with the law, and probably the reason it was repealed, has to do with the other priveledges a driver's license bestows on the individual - most notably, implied citizenship and, even more importantly, the ID necessary to legally acquire firearms in this country. As stupid as that sounds, I recall those as being the primary arguments against the law when it was passed earlier this Fall. Additionally, possessing a DL, at least in California, requires a SSN - which illegal immigrants don't have (typically); as soon as they get an SSN, they're closer to citizenship than ever before. Opponents to imigration see the DL issue as one that facilitates "already lax" immigration procedures.

I think that your thought for an international DL is a good one; however, it would require a standardization of road-signage, an agreement of which side of the road drivers use, and other logistical issues.

Regardless, this is a point of contention that will be raised again in California so long as there are politicians who court the issue.

Posted by: bran at December 2, 2003 02:45 PM

International driver's licenses already exist, despite the differing road rules between countries. They're generally applied for through embassies, and must accompany a real driver's license from your home country. So they're a viable option right now.

Thanks for the further info on the political landscape for this law.

Posted by: Andrew at December 2, 2003 03:01 PM

Quick addition to my earlier comment: I don't want to give the impression that I'm anti-immigration. At the same time, I was opposed to the law when it passed (as I was a CA resident at that time). Go international DLs!

Posted by: bran at December 2, 2003 05:35 PM

I have never really been able to decide one way or another if I thought this was a good idea. On one hand you have the points that Brandon mentioned. On the other, I know I would feel better on the roads knowing that a larger percentage of the drivers have proven that they have at least some knowledge of the road rules and have had their eyesight checked.

I'm guessing that if someone is already in the country illegally, he/she isn't really going to care about staying off the roads due to lack of having a license. At least this way that somebody might have a bit better idea of what he/she should be doing on the road.

Posted by: Ryan at December 3, 2003 11:11 AM

I bet it would be difficult to get car insurance as an illegal. No?

Posted by: Shylo at December 3, 2003 12:13 PM

Well, it seems like it shouldn't be. After all, illegal immigrants can rent apartments, buy cars, do other things along those lines...I suppose they pay cash for those things, but they could pay cash for their insurance, too. An insurance company could probably structure a policy for illegal immigrants without much difficulty, I imagine. Or Mexican insurance companies (surely some exist) could cover Mexican drivers in the US.

I really have no idea whether this would work at all, but it seems like maybe there are other ways around the problem besides the law that was repealed.

Posted by: Andrew at December 3, 2003 01:31 PM

[Schwarzenegger, no t.]

Posted by: R. at December 3, 2003 01:38 PM

Whoops, fixed.

Posted by: Andrew at December 3, 2003 02:29 PM