June 16, 2003
I am Anti-stereotype Man!
Able to spot egregious stereotypes wherever they may lie!
Now, most people who know me are aware that I'm not much of a fan of political correctness. It's a long way around a small problem, and usually sounds more stilted and wrong than the supposedly crude or insensitive phrase it replaces. However, that doesn't mean I'm in favor of stereotypes. Sure there's a chewy truth at the center of each of these suckers, but that doesn't mean they're fair or even accurate.
It's rare to see a stereotype show up in the media these da-- actually, no it's not. They're in there all the time, wreaking havok on the common man's ability to understand and sympathize with cultures other than his own. Case in point, today's column by Richard Roeper in the Sun-Times, in which he discusses the heckling of Sikh golfer Vijay Singh:
What cracks me up about this incident is the utterly tame nature of the heckle: "Hey Vijay, I think Annika could have put it in!"
Oooh, scathing. It's a wonder Singh was able to finish the round without collapsing in sobs.
I mean, that sounds like something you'd hear if you couldn't properly load the Slurpee machine: "Hey Vijay, I think Annika could have put it in!"
Properly load the Slurpee machine?!? Comparing a pro golfer with a convenience store owner? WTF?! I know Apu is a dearly loved Simpsons character, but about the only more negative stereotype Roeper could have chosen would probably be donut shop owner. There's no way Roeper would have approached such an image had the golfer been black -- the racial descrimination lines are too well drawn there, and he'd have Jesse Jackson on his ass in a minute. But since Singh is an Indian, and there are so few Indians in America, it seemed he felt this little insult could slide. After all, it's just what Indians do, right? Run convenience stores and donut shops and drive taxis? Right?
I don't think so. Maybe I'm being overly sensitive, but I think if I were to go to the convenience store in the strip mall next to my office and ask the Indo/Pak owner what he thought, he might bristle a little. I bet if I showed it to an Indian doctor he'd fume just a bit. And I wouldn't blame them.
Separately, Sun-Times TV reviewer Phil Rosenthal reports that Orlando Jones has a new talk show debuting tonight on FX. Making a play on the star's initials -- O.J. -- he claims the star has done some polarizing in the past.
But love or hate his ubiquitous (and presumably lucrative) 7-Up commercials--rooted in the premise that leaving a bad taste in your mouth will have you reaching for something that tastes good--don't hold them against Orlando Jones as he launches his new late-night gabfest, "The Orlando Jones Show," at 10 tonight.
He goes on to describe several of the 7-Up commercials Jones has appeared in, including one in which he "shar[es] screentime with a defecating bear."
Only one problem: that's not Orlando Jones. Jones hasn't appeared in a new 7-Up commercial for more than a year. The commercials Rosenthal described star actor/comedian Godfrey, who, other than also being black, looks very little like Jones. Whoops.
Posted by Andrew Huff at June 16, 2003 02:41 PMNot to mention that Apu has a Squishee machine. ;-)
And when will the freakin' PC debate end! It's just a way for them right-wingers to distract people from the real debate of how we talk about people, how we view people, blahblah...argh.
Posted by: Roni at June 16, 2003 03:27 PMRight Wingers? Political Correctness is the unfortunate side effect of a liberal education.
... and the debate won't end until people stop taking up other people's battle flags.
Do you think that Vejay is really hurt by what some second-rate sports journalist writes? I doubt it. I think the Indo/Pak grocery store owner would be pissed off by the fact that you don't know if he is Pakistani or Indian, and are lumping them into the same category!
Have you ever thought that owning a 7-Eleven is not an insult to them? Those people are amazingly successful. Apu drives a sportscar for Christ's sake.
Posted by: Peter at June 16, 2003 04:15 PMVijay is from Fiji.
Posted by: K at June 16, 2003 04:59 PMThe point of this post was not political correctness. In fact, I went out of my way to say that I don't like political correctness. However, to call it an effect of a liberal education is a fallacy. You'll find people of all political stripes using it with abandon, and both leftists and rightists are happy to slam it whenever it's politically advantageous. The key word in the term is political, not correctness.
Vijay is indeed from Fiji, but he is of Indian decent, just as my Indian classmates in gradeschool were Americans of Indian decent. The clerk at the convenience store probably wouldn't be offended if I didn't know if he was Paki or Indian any more than I'd be offended that he didn't know whether I was of Italian or German or whatever ancestry -- because we don't know each other.
My point was: Stereotypes are unproductive, often inaccurate and sometimes hurtful. It doesn't have to be race; calling all liberals "bleeding hearts" or all Republicans "money-grubbing assholes" is just as much a stereotype as saying all Mexicans sleep 20 to a room -- no matter who is being stereotyped it's not going to help. Roeper probably didn't even recognize that he was dropping a stereotype in his column, but I spotted it and called him on it. You're right, Vijay probably won't care that he was compared to some guy refilling a Slurpee (or Squishee) machine, but you never know.
Yes, convenience store owners make a decent living. So do drug dealers and landscapers, but I doubt blacks and hispanics appreciate it when someone assumes that's their job.
Posted by: Andrew at June 16, 2003 05:21 PMwait, aren't all republicans....
oh stop. just lightening things up in here.
thoughtful post, andrew.
Posted by: miss ellen at June 16, 2003 10:34 PMWhen you start a post out with "I'm not a fan of PC, but..." you open the whole can of icky worms. You're right, both sides hack & wheeze over PC words, but it's still a debate that is stuck on people being too sensitive to words than of people debating how the words really reflect the world and the intent. Just as you took slight offense to Rich comparing Vijay to Apu, someone else might take the same offense to being called a male nurse.
Oh, and there's no way we would ever fit 20 to a room, unless it's a big room, of course.
Posted by: Roni at June 17, 2003 08:37 AMWell said, Andrew. It inspired a thought that I fleshed out a little further on my blog, but here's the long and short of it:
Subconsciously, I'm prejudiced. I recognize that. There are situations where I feel my adrenal reaction kick in, and I consciously recognize it's because of racial (or, frankly, political) stereotypes. I pretty much hate that about myself. I try to diffuse it by consciously ignoring that biological reaction and allowing myself to deal with people as individuals and not as members of races or political groups because my greatest fear isn't offending that person, but rather missing the opportunity to get to know them.
Posted by: Jeffrey Utech at June 17, 2003 10:16 AMRoni, stereotypes do not equal political correctness or vice-versa. When I ignore your statements about P.C., you're pretty much backing me up: we need to watch what we say, because it may be that what we're saying is offensive and subtly prejudicial.
"Male nurse" could be offensive because it assumes the stereotype of all nurses being female is true. Political correctness doesn't enter into it -- other than it's politically correct to avoid stereotypes and offensive terms.
Once upon a time -- the turn of the century or so -- the 20-to-a-room stereotype applied to Italians; stereotypes can be a moving target, and all the political correctness in the world can't stamp out what's hiding beneath the surface. It's window dressing, and it gets in the way of sovling the real problems of descrimination.
Posted by: Andrew at June 17, 2003 10:40 AMStereotypes exist simply because its easier to make vast generalizations about groups of people than it is to take every person as an individual. And, I think it is everyone's responsibility to combat the stereotypes they perpetuate, and the stereotypes perpetuated by others. If we're combatting a stereotype for another group of people we need to be careful that we aren't assuming what they'll be offended by. I'm sure there is some Japanese kid in an engineering class who doesn't think the "all Asians are good at math and science" is a negative stereotype, but a Korean woman who is incredibly funny and bad at math will tell you it is.
Posted by: Cinnamon at June 17, 2003 11:01 AM